UK Asylum System Under Pressure: New Reforms, AI Concerns, and 80,000-Case Backlog

Last updated: 15 October 2026

The UK asylum system is facing serious scrutiny from multiple directions simultaneously, according to a detailed report published by the European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) on March 20, 2026. The government has introduced new asylum reforms, the UK-France "One in, one out" transfer scheme has encountered significant legal and practical obstacles, legal experts are challenging the Home Office's use of artificial intelligence in asylum assessments, and official statistics confirm the appeals backlog has nearly doubled in 12 months.

New Reforms and Political Controversy

In early March, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood announced a package of measures including a temporary halt on study visas for nationals of Afghanistan, Cameroon, Myanmar, and Sudan; payments of up to £40,000 to incentivise voluntary returns for unsuccessful asylum applicants; and a new rule requiring the review of refugee status every 30 months. The Home Secretary also removed the legal duty to provide accommodation support to applicants who break the law, work illegally, or have independent financial means.

The announcements came days after the Labour party lost a by-election in a previously safe constituency. Approximately 100 Labour MPs wrote a private letter to Mahmood expressing concern, while NGOs including the Scottish Refugee Council and the Immigration Law Practitioners' Association urged the withdrawal of the 30-month review policy, calling for "a fairer asylum system" built on "political courage and the rejection of performative cruelty."

AI in Asylum Decisions: An Unlawful Practice?

A legal opinion commissioned by the digital rights organisation Open Rights Group and published in March warns that the Home Office's use of generative AI tools in asylum case assessments "does not meet a number of legal obligations" and opens the door to legal challenges. Critically, asylum applicants are not informed that AI is being used to assess their cases, and the outputs of the AI tools are not shared with them — a transparency failure that the legal experts say is incompatible with the requirements of fairness and lawfulness for decisions affecting fundamental rights.

If AI tools are influencing asylum decisions, there must be full transparency about how those systems operate and how their outputs are used. Without that transparency, it becomes extremely difficult to ensure that decisions affecting fundamental rights are lawful and fair.

Robina Allen KC and Dee Masters, legal opinion authors

A Backlog That Is Getting Worse

Home Office statistics published on March 12 revealed that more than 80,000 people were awaiting asylum appeals at the end of 2025 — a 91% increase on the previous year and higher than the number waiting for an initial decision (64,000). The average processing time has risen to 63 weeks. The Refugee Council attributed the growing backlog directly to poor-quality initial decision-making by the Home Office, which forces applicants into the appeals process and leaves them stuck in asylum accommodation, unable to work or rebuild their lives, for years.

Source: European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE)

With an 80,000-case backlog and concerns over AI-assisted decisions, well-sourced country evidence matters more at appeal; our expert witness finder lists specialists by nationality.