Get a Sample Report, Expert CV, and Free Consultation

‘No Exit’: How Indefinite Conscription Traps Eritreans in Perpetual Military Service

Refuge and Protection of Human Rights Worldwide

Context and Introduction
In a remote training camp in western Eritrea, hundreds of young people line up at dawn for roll-call. Many of them were transferred here directly after completing secondary school, barely eighteen years old. They do not know when—if ever—they will be allowed to return to their families. This is the reality of Eritrea’s system of indefinite national service, which functions less as temporary civic duty and more as a lifelong sentence.

When Eritrea won independence from Ethiopia in 1991, compulsory service was presented as a patriotic duty to defend the new nation and contribute to reconstruction. But what began as an eighteen-month obligation has, over time, transformed into an open-ended system that keeps Eritreans trapped in uniform for years, sometimes decades. Today, national service is the defining feature of civic life: almost every Eritrean family has a son, daughter, or parent still conscripted.

This article examines the structure of the system, its human impact, and the wider socio-economic and regional consequences. It argues that indefinite conscription amounts to state-sponsored forced labour, violates fundamental rights, and fuels one of the largest refugee flows in Africa.


Legal and Policy Framework
On paper, Eritrea’s National Service Proclamation of 1995 set out clear terms: six months of military training, followed by twelve months of development service. In practice, however, the “temporary” service has become permanent. Secondary school pupils are required to complete their final year at Sawa Defence Training Centre, blending education with military drills. From there, conscripts are funnelled into the army, civil administration, or state-run industries. Release is rare and often arbitrary.

This indefinite extension contravenes international legal norms. Eritrea is bound by treaties prohibiting forced labour, including the International Labour Organisation conventions, as well as human rights instruments guaranteeing liberty, family life, and freedom of movement. The absence of provisions for conscientious objection, combined with punitive measures against deserters or draft evaders, further heightens the system’s coercive character.

The Eritrean government defends its stance by citing ongoing regional threats, particularly the unresolved border tensions with Ethiopia and instability in the Horn of Africa. Yet analysts argue that maintaining an entire population under arms is neither proportionate nor justifiable. It is a policy that entrenches authoritarian control rather than ensuring national defence.


Lived Experience and Human Impact
Conscription in Eritrea is not simply military. Thousands of teachers, nurses, and civil servants are technically still “serving” decades after first being conscripted. They are paid token wages—often insufficient to support a family—while their deployment is dictated by the state.

For many, the psychological burden is overwhelming. A former teacher, conscripted since the late 1990s, explained that she has never been able to choose her workplace or plan for retirement. Young women at Sawa recount not only harsh physical conditions but also exposure to sexual harassment by commanding officers.

Families suffer too. Parents can go years without seeing their children; marriages are delayed indefinitely; careers and education are interrupted. Those who attempt to desert or flee risk arbitrary detention, torture, or punishment of their relatives. The phrase “no exit” is used frequently by Eritreans themselves—an acknowledgment that national service has become a trap.


Socio-Economic and Regional Consequences
The economic consequences are devastating. By tying skilled professionals to state service at subsistence wages, the government effectively suppresses labour markets. Hospitals lack doctors, schools lack qualified teachers, and agriculture relies on poorly paid recruits rather than motivated workers. The private sector is stunted, unable to compete with the state’s monopoly over labour.

The indefinite nature of conscription is also the single largest driver of Eritrean migration. Each year, tens of thousands attempt to escape—crossing into Sudan, Ethiopia, or undertaking perilous journeys towards Europe. The risks are enormous: traffickers, torture camps in the Sinai, drownings in the Mediterranean. Yet the lack of future inside Eritrea pushes people to take these chances.

Neighbouring states and European countries feel the consequences, as asylum claims mount and border policies tighten. Eritrean refugees consistently cite conscription as their primary reason for flight. Meanwhile, the Eritrean government benefits from diaspora remittances, creating a perverse cycle in which forced exile indirectly sustains the regime.


Accountability, Reform, and Conclusion
Eritrea has a clear duty under international law to demobilise its citizens after a reasonable period, establish transparent limits, and safeguard the rights of those in service. Accountability begins with acknowledging that indefinite conscription is unlawful forced labour.

Practical steps are possible:
- Time-bound reforms: introduce a strict eighteen-month maximum for all service.
- Civil oversight: create independent mechanisms for complaints, including protections against sexual abuse and exploitation.
- Economic revitalisation: allow professionals to re-enter the civilian workforce, thereby strengthening public services and the private economy.
- International engagement: donors and regional bodies such as the African Union should condition aid and cooperation on verifiable reform. Protection pathways—including family reunification and scholarships—can also alleviate the burden on Eritrean youth.

Ultimately, the human toll of indefinite conscription is unsustainable. It locks individuals into years of servitude, undermines families, hollows out the economy, and destabilises the wider region. Eritreans deserve the right to live ordinary lives—study, work, marry, raise children—without the looming shadow of permanent military service. Until the system changes, Eritrea’s future will remain trapped alongside its people.

How to Order an Expert Witness Report?
If you are a law firm handling an asylum case or an applicant seeking professional expertise, you can request an expert witness report directly from The Human Rights.

🔹 On the website: thehuman-rights.com — Click the "Apply Now" button anywhere on the site to Get a Sample Report, Expert CV, and Free Consultation.

🔹 Alternatively, email us at: ✉️ info@thehuman-rights.com— and we will respond within ONE HOUR.


📩 Submit your request today! Our team is ready to assist with professional and well-researched expert reports to support your asylum case.


🔗 Follow Us 🔗

► Website: thehuman-rights.com

► YouTube: @The_Human_Rights_eng

► LinkedIn: Maxim Kharitonov

— Our Expertise Covers a Wide Range of Regions and Countries

At The Human Rights, our expertise spans multiple regions, with a network of experts specializing in political persecution, human rights violations, and systemic repression across different parts of the world. Our reports provide in-depth analysis of the conditions in each country, covering freedom of speech, political repression, corruption, war crimes, persecution based on ethnicity, religion, or social status, and conditions in detention facilities.
  • Eritrea: One of the most repressive regimes in Africa, known for indefinite forced conscription, lack of press freedom, and human rights abuses.

  • Sudan & South Sudan: Ongoing civil conflicts, ethnic persecution, and government oppression pose significant risks to individuals.

  • Somalia: Widespread political instability, armed conflict, and persecution by extremist groups.

  • Ethiopia: Ethnic tensions, political repression, and human rights violations amid internal conflicts.

  • Djibouti: Political suppression and lack of democratic freedoms.

  • Kenya & Uganda: Cases of politically motivated persecution, state oppression, and human rights violations against marginalized groups.

East Africa

  • Pakistan & Afghanistan: Religious and political persecution, gender-based violence, and Taliban rule in Afghanistan.

  • Bangladesh: Crackdowns on political opposition and suppression of press freedom.

  • India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan: Religious and ethnic tensions, caste-based persecution, and limitations on political dissent.

South & Central Asia

  • Syria, Iraq, Yemen: Armed conflicts, war crimes, and persecution of minority groups.

  • Iran & Saudi Arabia: Suppression of political dissent, harsh treatment of women, and religious persecution.

  • Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine: Displacement, statelessness, and civil unrest.

Middle East

  • Albania, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Serbia, Bosnia & Herzegovina: Political instability, discrimination, and corruption affecting civil liberties.

Western Balkans

  • Russia: Political persecution, corruption, suppression of opposition, and war-related persecution.

  • Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova: Human rights violations amid war, repression of dissent, and crackdowns on activists.

  • Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan: Ethnic conflicts, political oppression, and press freedom restrictions.

  • Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan: State repression, abuse of prisoners, and lack of political freedoms.

Eastern Europe & Post-Soviet States

  • Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua: Authoritarian regimes, political imprisonment, and economic persecution.

  • Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Haiti, Colombia: Cartel violence, government corruption, and state-sponsored persecution.

  • Peru, Bolivia, Brazil, Dominican Republic: Political repression and indigenous rights violations.

Latin America & the Caribbean

  • China & North Korea: State control, forced labor camps, and suppression of freedom.

  • Mongolia, Vietnam, Myanmar: Government oppression, political arrests, and persecution of ethnic minorities.

East Asia

We ensure that every expert witness report provides fact-based, legally relevant analysis, helping to strengthen asylum cases worldwide.
Leave your contact information below and sign up for a ZOOM meeting
for an initial presentation, Q&A session, demonstration of the contract, and calculation of all relocation options and asylum application.
This meeting does not commit you to anything
Contact US and Get a Sample Report, Expert CV, and Free Consultation
WhatsApp
Mail
Phone