Human Rights Experts · https://thehuman-rights.com/georgia-domestic-violence-asylum-reason/
Country of Origin Information Post-Soviet Region (CIS) Women's Rights

Domestic Violence in Georgia: The #1 Reason Georgians Seek Asylum

Domestic Violence in Georgia: The #1 Reason Georgians Seek Asylum

Last updated:

Photo: Georgia - Gill M L

Georgia domestic violence is the main reason Georgian women seek asylum abroad. The law exists. Restraining orders exist. Shelters exist. But the system fails at every step. Police treat abuse as a "family matter." Officers pressure women to go back to their husbands. Restraining orders are not monitored. When abusers break them, nothing happens. Georgia has only five state-funded shelters for its entire population of 3.7 million people. For asylum decision-makers and expert witnesses, understanding this enforcement gap is critical. This report examines the full picture of Georgia domestic violence: the scale, the laws, the failures, and what it all means for asylum claims.

14%
Women reporting physical violence by a partner
6%
Women reporting sexual violence by a partner
5
State-funded DV shelters nationwide
~100
Total shelter places for 3.7M population

The Scale of Georgia Domestic Violence

The numbers are alarming. According to a 2023 study by UN Women and GEOSTAT (Georgia's national statistics office), 14% of Georgian women have experienced physical violence from an intimate partner. Approximately 6% have experienced sexual violence. These numbers are based on women who agreed to answer questions about abuse. The true figures are almost certainly higher.[1]

Underreporting is severe. Georgian culture treats domestic violence as a private matter. Many women feel deep shame about the abuse they suffer. They fear that their families and communities will blame them rather than their abusers. In rural areas, the pressure to stay silent is even stronger. Elders and family members often tell women to "be patient" and "keep the family together." As a result, many women never report the violence they experience. Those who do report often face pressure from police to withdraw their complaints.[2]

The violence follows a clear pattern. It often starts with emotional and psychological abuse: insults, control over money, isolation from friends and family. Then it becomes physical. Slapping, punching, kicking, and choking are commonly reported. In the most extreme cases, it ends in femicide. Georgia records multiple femicides each year. The Public Defender's Office has documented cases where women who had previously reported abuse to police were later killed by their partners.[3]

Georgia has a solid legal framework against domestic violence. The Law on the Elimination of Domestic Violence, Protection and Assistance to Victims of Domestic Violence was adopted in 2006. It was a significant step forward. The law establishes two types of protective measures:

  • Restraining orders: Issued by police. They take effect immediately and last for one month. A restraining order bans the abuser from the home and prohibits contact with the victim.
  • Protection orders: Issued by courts. They last for six months and can be extended. They provide longer-term protection and can include conditions about children, property, and finances.[4]

In addition, Criminal Code Article 126.1 specifically criminalises family violence. The penalties range from community service to up to three years in prison. For repeat offenders, the sentences can be higher. Georgia also ratified the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence (the Istanbul Convention) in 2017. This means Georgia has committed to international standards of protection.[5]

On paper, these laws look good. They cover the key issues: prevention, protection, punishment. The problem is what happens when a woman actually tries to use them. For a broader view of human rights protections, see our dedicated section.

The Enforcement Gap: Where the System Fails

The gap between Georgia's domestic violence laws and their enforcement is the central problem. The Council of Europe's Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (GREVIO) published its baseline evaluation report on Georgia in 2022. The findings were deeply critical. GREVIO identified "systemic failures" in how Georgia responds to domestic violence.[6]

Police Response: "It Is a Family Matter"

When a woman calls police about domestic violence, the response is often inadequate. Officers frequently treat the complaint as a family dispute rather than a crime. They arrive at the home and try to mediate. They ask the woman whether she really wants to proceed. They suggest that the couple "work things out." In many cases, they tell the woman to think about her children and her family honour. This pressure often leads women to withdraw their complaints.[7]

Even when police issue restraining orders, enforcement is weak. There is no systematic monitoring. Police do not check whether the abuser is complying with the order. The abuser can violate the restraining order repeatedly with little consequence. Prosecution for restraining order violations is rare. GREVIO found that many police officers lack proper training on domestic violence. Some officers share the same cultural attitudes that normalise abuse.

Georgia: DV Reports vs. Restraining Orders vs. Prosecutions (2022)
DV Reports
~4,200
~4,200
Restraining Orders
~2,300
~2,300
Protection Orders
~920
~920
Prosecutions
~580
~580
Convictions
~340
~340
Figure 1: The funnel of attrition: from DV report to conviction. Most cases drop out at each stage. Source: Public Defender of Georgia; GEOSTAT; Ministry of Internal Affairs (2022 data).

Law vs. Reality

What the Law Says What Actually Happens
Police must issue restraining orders when DV is reported Police often talk victims out of filing complaints. Orders are issued in only about 55% of reports.
Restraining orders must be monitored No systematic monitoring exists. Police do not routinely check compliance.
Violating a restraining order is a criminal offence Violations are rarely prosecuted. Abusers learn that orders have no real consequences.
Victims have a right to shelter and support services Only 5 shelters exist nationwide with ~100 places. Many victims are turned away or have no access.
DV is a criminal offence under Article 126.1 Only about 8% of DV reports lead to convictions. Most cases are dropped or downgraded.
Victims can access free legal aid Legal aid is underfunded. Lawyers lack DV training. Rural areas have almost no legal services.
Table 1: The gap between Georgian domestic violence law and its actual enforcement. Sources: GREVIO baseline report (2022); Public Defender of Georgia annual reports (2023-2024).

Shelters: Five for an Entire Country

Georgia has only five state-funded shelters for domestic violence victims. These shelters are located in Tbilisi, Gori, Kutaisi, Batumi, and Sighnaghi. Together, they can hold approximately 100 women and their children. For a country of 3.7 million people, this is deeply insufficient.[8]

The shelters themselves provide a reasonable level of support. They offer accommodation, psychological counselling, legal advice, and help with finding employment. However, the demand far exceeds the supply. Women are often told there are no places available. Waiting lists can be long. Women in rural areas may not even know that shelters exist. Transport to a shelter can take hours. There are no anonymous shelter locations, which means abusers can sometimes find out where their victims are staying.

Some NGOs run additional shelters and crisis centres. However, these depend on international funding, and the 2024 foreign agents law has put that funding at risk. Several NGOs working on domestic violence have had to register under the new law. This creates an uncertain future for the limited services that do exist.

The Pattern: Report, Ignore, Repeat, Femicide

Case files from Georgian domestic violence cases reveal a tragic and predictable pattern. A woman reports abuse. Police come to the home. They may or may not issue a restraining order. Even if they do, there is no follow-up. The abuser returns. The violence continues, often worse than before because the woman "dared" to report. The woman reports again. The same thing happens. After several cycles, one of two things occurs: the woman gives up and stays in the abusive relationship, or the abuse escalates to the point of serious injury or death.[9]

Femicide cases in Georgia often show this pattern. The Public Defender's Office has documented cases where women reported violence multiple times before being killed. In several documented cases, police had visited the home, issued a restraining order, and then done nothing when the abuser returned. The system knew the woman was in danger. It had the tools to act. It failed to use them.

Georgia's response to domestic violence is characterised by a significant gap between the legislative framework and its practical implementation. Police attitudes, insufficient monitoring of protective measures, and a chronic shortage of shelters leave victims without effective protection.
GREVIO, Baseline Evaluation Report: Georgia (2022)

Economic Barriers: No Money, No Escape

Even when a woman wants to leave, economics hold her back. Georgia has high rates of female economic dependence. Many women, especially in rural areas, do not work outside the home. They have no income and no savings. Property is usually registered in the husband's name. Bank accounts are often controlled by the husband. If a woman leaves with nothing, she has nowhere to live and no way to support herself or her children.[10]

Social stigma adds another layer. Divorced women are often viewed negatively. Their own families may refuse to take them back. Friends and neighbours may blame the woman for "breaking up the family." This social pressure is especially strong in rural communities and among ethnic minorities. Women who leave face isolation on top of poverty. For more context on these issues, see our country reports.

Internal Relocation: Not a Real Option

Asylum decision-makers sometimes ask: could the woman relocate within Georgia? The answer, in most cases, is no. Georgia is a small country, covering only 69,700 square kilometres. Family and social networks are strong. An abusive husband can easily find a woman who has moved to another city. There is no witness protection programme for domestic violence victims. Shelter addresses are not always confidential.[11]

Even if a woman could hide, she would face the same problems everywhere in Georgia. Police attitudes toward domestic violence are similar across the country. The shortage of shelters affects every region. Economic barriers exist in Tbilisi just as they do in rural villages. Moving to another city does not solve the fundamental problem: the Georgian state cannot or will not protect women from domestic violence.

Critical point for asylum claims: Internal relocation is not a viable alternative for Georgian DV victims. Georgia is too small, social networks are too strong, and the state protection failures are nationwide. Asylum decision-makers should not refuse claims solely because the applicant could theoretically move to another part of Georgia.

Implications for Asylum Claims

Georgia domestic violence creates valid grounds for international protection. Under the 1951 Refugee Convention, women fleeing domestic violence can qualify as members of a particular social group (PSG). The key elements that support Georgian DV asylum claims are as follows:

  • Well-founded fear of persecution: The violence itself constitutes persecution. Physical and sexual violence by a partner is serious harm.
  • Non-state actor persecution: The abuser is the persecutor. The claim succeeds if the state is unable or unwilling to provide protection.
  • State failure: The evidence clearly shows that Georgia cannot protect DV victims. Police failures, lack of shelters, and non-enforcement of orders demonstrate this.
  • No internal relocation alternative: Georgia's small size and nationwide protection gaps make relocation unreasonable.
  • Nexus to Convention ground: Georgian women fleeing DV belong to a PSG defined by gender, nationality, and their status as victims of domestic violence in a society that fails to protect them.[12]

In the UK, the Home Office Country Policy and Information Note on Georgia acknowledges the protection gap for DV victims. However, some decision-makers still refuse claims by arguing that the law exists and that Georgia is a "democratic country." The evidence in this report shows that the law's existence is meaningless without enforcement. For expert assistance with Georgian DV asylum claims, visit our expert witness directory.

Key UK case law: In DV cases from Georgia, representatives should consider the principles in Horvath v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 1 AC 489 (state protection standard) and the specific CPIN guidance. The GREVIO baseline report provides authoritative evidence of systemic state failure that meets the Horvath threshold.

Conclusion

Georgia domestic violence is a human rights crisis hiding behind a respectable legal framework. The laws look good on paper. The reality is different. Police treat abuse as a family problem. Restraining orders are not enforced. Five shelters serve 3.7 million people. Women who report violence are pressured to withdraw their complaints. The pattern of report, ignore, repeat, and sometimes femicide continues year after year.

For Georgian women fleeing domestic violence, asylum may be the only real protection available. The evidence supports claims based on membership of a particular social group. The state's failure to protect is well-documented by GREVIO, the Public Defender's Office, and international organisations. Asylum decision-makers should assess each claim carefully, but they should not assume that Georgia's legal framework provides effective protection. The gap between law and reality is too wide. Consult our asylum guide for more information on how to build a strong case.


Footnotes

  1. UN Women and GEOSTAT, 'National Study on Violence Against Women in Georgia' (2023); WHO, 'Violence Against Women Prevalence Estimates 2018: Georgia' (2021)
  2. UNFPA Georgia, 'Gender-Based Violence in Georgia: Perceptions, Attitudes and Prevalence' (2022); Caucasus Research Resource Centers (CRRC), 'Social Attitudes Toward Domestic Violence' (2023)
  3. Public Defender of Georgia, 'Special Report on Femicide and Domestic Violence-Related Deaths' (2023); UN Women Georgia, 'Femicide Watch Data' (2024)
  4. Parliament of Georgia, Law on the Elimination of Domestic Violence, Protection and Assistance to Victims of Domestic Violence (2006, as amended); Articles 10-12 (restraining and protection orders)
  5. Criminal Code of Georgia, Article 126.1 (family violence); Georgia ratified the Istanbul Convention on 19 May 2017 (CETS No. 210)
  6. GREVIO, 'Baseline Evaluation Report: Georgia' (GREVIO/Inf(2022)28, adopted 7 October 2022) paras 43-67
  7. GREVIO (n 6) paras 170-185; Social Justice Center (formerly EMC), 'Police Response to Domestic Violence in Georgia' (2023)
  8. State Fund for Protection and Assistance of (Statutory) Victims of Human Trafficking, 'Annual Report 2023' (Tbilisi, 2024); GREVIO (n 6) paras 94-102
  9. Public Defender of Georgia, 'Annual Report on Human Rights Situation in Georgia: 2023' (2024) ch 8 (domestic violence); Women's Information Center, 'DV Case Analysis' (2023)
  10. UN Women Georgia, 'Women's Economic Empowerment in the South Caucasus' (2022); National Statistics Office of Georgia (GEOSTAT), 'Women and Men in Georgia: Statistical Publication' (2024)
  11. UK Home Office, 'Country Policy and Information Note: Georgia — Domestic Violence' (updated 2024); UNHCR, 'International Protection Considerations with Regard to People Fleeing Georgia' (2025)
  12. UNHCR, 'Guidelines on International Protection No. 1: Gender-Related Persecution' (HCR/GIP/02/01, 7 May 2002); Horvath v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 1 AC 489 (HL)

Need an expert witness report for your case?

Our country experts provide independent reports for asylum and immigration cases in the UK, US, Canada, and EU.
Order an expert witness report  |  Find a country expert witness  |  About our expert team

Share this article: 𝕏 f in ☎
Human rights documentation photo
Human Rights Experts
Expert witness reports and country condition analysis for asylum and human rights cases worldwide.
Stay Informed
Subscribe to receive the latest human rights news, expert analysis, and country condition updates.
© 2026 Human Rights Experts. All Rights Reserved.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram