What Is a Fresh Claim? When You Get a Second Chance

Last updated: 5 October 2026

Photo: claim paperwork - franchise opportunities

Your asylum claim was refused. Your appeals are finished. But something has changed. Can you make a fresh claim asylum application? In many cases, yes. A fresh claim gives you a second chance at protection when new evidence or changed circumstances make your case significantly different from before. This guide explains how fresh claims work in the UK, the US, and Canada, and what you need to succeed.[1]

A fresh claim is not the same as an appeal. An appeal says the original decision was wrong. A fresh claim says something new has happened since that decision. It could be a change of government in your home country, a new law that criminalises your identity, or evidence you could not get before. This asylum guide explains when and how to use this important legal tool.

UK Fresh Claims: Further Submissions Under Paragraph 353

In the UK, a fresh claim is officially called "further submissions." The rules are found in paragraph 353 of the Immigration Rules. After your asylum claim has been refused and your appeal rights are exhausted, you can submit new material to the Home Office and ask it to treat your case as a fresh claim.[2]

The Home Office applies a two-part legal test. First, the submissions must contain material that has not already been considered. Second, taken together with the material that was considered before, the new material must create a "realistic prospect of success" before an immigration judge. In simple terms: is it genuinely new, and does it give your claim a reasonable chance of winning?

You make further submissions to the Home Office, usually through your solicitor. The solicitor prepares a detailed letter explaining exactly what the new evidence is and why it meets the paragraph 353 test. If the Home Office accepts it as a fresh claim, you get a new decision and, if refused again, a new right of appeal to the First-tier Tribunal. If they reject it, you can challenge that rejection by judicial review in the High Court.[3]

What Counts as "Significantly Different" Material

Not every piece of new information will meet the test. The material must be genuinely different and must change the overall picture in an important way. Here are the types of evidence that courts have accepted as significantly different.[4]

• New evidence of past events: Documents, witness statements, or records that were not available before. For example, a family member may have found an arrest warrant or a medical record in your home country.
• Changed country conditions: The situation in your home country has changed. A new government took power. A war started. A new law targets your ethnic, religious, or political group. Updated reports from UNHCR, Human Rights Watch, or Amnesty International can document these changes.
• New legal arguments: A new court decision changes the law in a way that applies to your case. For example, a new "country guidance" case in the UK might find that people with your profile are now at risk.
• Sur place activities: These are things you did after leaving your home country that put you at new risk if you return. Political activism in the UK, public involvement in opposition groups, or publishing criticism of your government online are all examples.
• Coming out or conversion: If you have come out as LGBTQ+ or converted to a new religion since your original claim, this is new evidence. The previous decision-maker did not consider it because it had not happened yet.

US: Motion to Reopen Your Asylum Case

In the US, the equivalent of a fresh claim is a motion to reopen. This is governed by Section 240(c)(7) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). A motion to reopen asks the immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) to reopen your case because of new evidence.[5]

Deadlines and Exceptions

The general deadline for a motion to reopen is 90 days from the date of the final order of removal. You can only file one motion. However, there is an important exception. If you can show that country conditions have materially changed, there is no time limit. This exception is the most common way that asylum seekers reopen their cases. You must provide evidence that was not available and could not have been discovered at the time of the original hearing.

How It Works

You file the motion with whichever body issued the final decision -- the immigration court or the BIA. The motion must include the new evidence and a legal argument explaining why the case should be reopened. The judge or the BIA reviews it on paper. If they grant it, your case is reopened for a new hearing where you can present the new evidence.

Canada: Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA)

In Canada, the main route for a fresh claim is the Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA). If your refugee claim was refused by the Immigration and Refugee Board and you face removal from Canada, you may be eligible for a PRRA. A PRRA officer assesses whether you would face persecution, torture, a risk to your life, or cruel and unusual treatment if returned to your home country.[6]

You can present new evidence that was not available at your original IRB hearing. However, there are limits on when you can apply. The acceptance rate for PRRAs is low. Therefore, the quality of your new evidence is critical. Strong expert reports and updated country condition evidence significantly improve your chances.

Fresh Claim Routes: UK vs US vs Canada

Examples of What Triggers a Fresh Claim

Many different events can create the basis for a fresh claim asylum application. Here are real-world examples that have led to successful fresh claims.[7]

New regime in your home country: A coup or a change of government can make previously safe people targets. For example, if a military government takes power and begins persecuting members of the former ruling party, members of that party may have strong fresh claims.

New law criminalising your profile: If your home country introduces a law that criminalises homosexuality, religious conversion, or political dissent, this creates new evidence of risk. The law did not exist when your original claim was decided.

New persecution pattern documented: International organisations may publish new reports showing that a specific group now faces systematic persecution. For example, UNHCR may issue new guidance saying that a particular ethnic group is at risk.

Personal change since original claim: You may have converted to a new religion, come out as LGBTQ+, or become politically active since your first claim. These changes create new risks that did not exist before. Courts in all three countries recognise these "sur place" claims.

How Expert Witnesses Help Fresh Claims

Expert witnesses are especially important in fresh claim asylum cases. The entire point of a fresh claim is that something has changed. An expert witness can explain and document that change in a way that decision-makers trust and understand.[8]

A country expert can write a detailed report confirming that conditions in your home country have changed. They can explain how a new law affects people with your profile. They can describe whether the previous assessment of safety is still accurate. Furthermore, expert evidence helps clearly distinguish your fresh claim from your old claim. It shows the decision-maker that the situation is genuinely different now.

Medical experts can also support fresh claims. For example, if you have developed PTSD since your original claim, a medical report can explain how this new evidence relates to your persecution. Updated medical assessments can fill gaps in the original case. For more on how expert evidence and human rights documentation support asylum claims, see our resources.

The obligation of States not to return a person to a country where they face a real risk of serious harm is absolute and non-derogable. Changed circumstances must always be assessed.
UNHCR, Guidelines on International Protection: Cessation of Refugee Status (2003)

Common Mistakes That Cause Fresh Claims to Fail

Fresh claims fail when they are poorly prepared. Avoid these common mistakes to give your application the best chance of success.[9]

Filing without genuinely new material: This is the most common mistake. Simply repeating your original claim with the same evidence will fail immediately. The Home Office (UK), immigration judge (US), or PRRA officer (Canada) will reject it. You must have evidence that was not previously considered.

Not explaining why the evidence was not raised before: If the evidence existed at the time of your original claim, the decision-maker will ask why you did not present it then. You must give a clear explanation. Valid reasons include that you did not have access to the document, you were too traumatised to disclose certain facts, or you did not understand its relevance at the time.

Weak or low-quality evidence: A single newspaper article is usually not enough. You need strong, credible evidence. An expert report, a detailed witness statement, or an official human rights report carries far more weight. Focus on quality, not quantity.

No legal help: Fresh claims involve complex legal tests. Preparing one without a lawyer significantly reduces your chances. In the UK, check if you qualify for Legal Aid, especially for judicial review. In the US, contact a pro bono legal organisation. In Canada, legal aid clinics in most provinces can help.[10]

Conclusion

A fresh claim asylum application is a lifeline when circumstances change after your original claim is refused. In the UK, further submissions under paragraph 353 give you a route back. In the US, a motion to reopen can succeed when country conditions have materially changed. In Canada, the PRRA provides a final assessment before removal. The key to success is genuinely new evidence, strong expert support, and experienced legal representation. If your situation has changed, do not give up. A fresh claim could be your second chance at safety.