Last updated:
Photo: Beasts of Burden - David Stanley
You fled Eritrea years ago. Maybe five years, maybe eight, maybe even fifteen. You have been living in another country, trying to survive. Now you want to claim asylum, but you worry that your case is too old. You think it is too late. It is not. Your Eritrea old case valid claim can still succeed. This is because Eritrea has not changed. The same conditions that forced you to leave are still there today. This article explains why your case is still strong, how to explain the delay, and what evidence you need.[1]
Many Eritrean asylum seekers wait years before they file a claim. There are real reasons for this. Some people travel through many countries. Others are detained or exploited on the way. Some simply did not know they could claim asylum. Regardless of the reason, the core of your case remains the same. Eritrea is still one of the most repressive countries in the world, and your claim is still valid.
Same president since 1993
National service with no end date
National elections held — ever
Press Freedom Index 2025
Why Your Eritrea Old Case Is Still Valid
The most important fact about Eritrea is this: nothing has changed. President Isaias Afwerki has ruled the country since independence in 1993. There have been no elections. There is no constitution in practice. The same laws that were in place when you fled are still in force today. This matters a great deal for asylum claims.
Eritrea still operates indefinite national service. This means that every citizen can be forced to serve in the military or government work for life. There is no legal limit. Conscripts face forced labour, low or no pay, physical punishment, and sexual violence. The shoot-to-kill policy at the border is still in place. People who try to leave the country illegally still risk being shot, and those caught face imprisonment and torture.[2]
UNHCR has maintained its position on Eritrea for years. It continues to advise that Eritrean asylum seekers should not be returned. The agency recognises that anyone who left Eritrea illegally, evaded national service, or is perceived as a political opponent faces a real risk of persecution on return. This position has not changed since your departure. Therefore, the reasons you fled still exist today.[3]
For your asylum case, this is very good news. You do not need to show that something new happened. You need to show that the danger you fled from is still there. Country reports, expert assessments, and UNHCR guidance all confirm that it is.
The Delay Question: Why Did You Wait?
Courts will ask one key question: why did you not claim asylum sooner? This is a fair question. However, there are many legitimate reasons for a delay. The important thing is to explain your situation honestly. Judges understand that the path from Eritrea to safety is rarely simple or direct.
Many Eritreans travel through Sudan, Libya, Egypt, or Ethiopia before reaching Europe or the US. This journey can take years. Some people are detained in Libya, where migrants face torture, extortion, and forced labour. Others are exploited by smugglers. Some spend years in refugee camps in Ethiopia or Sudan, where formal asylum processes may not exist or may be inaccessible. These experiences explain the delay.[4]
Other reasons are equally valid. You may not have known that asylum was an option. You may have been afraid of authorities because of past experiences. Language barriers can prevent people from understanding the legal system. Some people maintained a different immigration status, such as a student or work visa, before their situation changed. All of these reasons are recognised by courts in both the UK and the US.
| Reason for Delay | Court Assessment | Strength |
|---|---|---|
| Transit through multiple countries | Widely accepted — journey from Eritrea often takes years | Strong |
| Detained in Libya or elsewhere | Very well recognised — well-documented migrant abuse | Very strong |
| Exploited by smugglers/traffickers | Accepted — especially with supporting evidence | Strong |
| Did not know about asylum | Accepted if credible — common among those from repressive states | Moderate |
| Fear of authorities/deportation | Accepted — especially for those from totalitarian regimes | Moderate |
| Language barriers | Accepted as a contributing factor, usually not sole reason | Moderate |
| Maintained other legal status | Accepted — shows lawful presence, not avoidance of system | Strong |
| Mental health / trauma | Accepted with medical evidence — trauma delays action | Strong |
Never lie about your timeline. Courts and immigration judges can detect inconsistencies in dates and travel history. If you fabricate reasons for your delay, it will destroy your credibility. Instead, explain the delay honestly. A genuine explanation, even if it is simple, is always stronger than a false one. Your lawyer can help you present your reasons clearly and effectively.
Evidence for Old Cases: What You Need
Building an evidence bundle for a case that started years ago is not as difficult as you might think. The key advantage is that conditions in Eritrea have not improved. This means current evidence supports your original reasons for fleeing. Here is what you need to gather.
Current country reports are your strongest tool. Reports from the UN Commission of Inquiry, UNHCR, the US State Department, the UK Home Office, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International all confirm that Eritrea's human rights situation remains severe. These reports cover the same issues you fled from: indefinite conscription, torture, arbitrary detention, and lack of political freedom. Because these conditions persist, the reports effectively validate your original claim.[5]
Your own testimony remains essential. You need to explain clearly what happened to you before you left, why you left, and what you experienced during your journey. Be specific about dates, places, and events. If your memory of some details is unclear after many years, say so honestly. Courts understand that trauma and the passage of time affect memory. Additionally, your testimony about transit experiences such as detention in Libya or exploitation by smugglers adds context to the delay.
An expert witness report is especially valuable for older cases. An expert on Eritrea can confirm that the conditions when you fled are the same conditions that exist today. They can explain why people from Eritrea face ongoing risk, why the delay in your case is consistent with known patterns, and why return would be dangerous. This bridges the gap between your past experience and the present situation.
How Expert Witnesses Bridge the Gap
When years have passed since you left Eritrea, an expert witness becomes especially important. The expert provides an independent, professional opinion that connects your personal history to the current reality in Eritrea. This is what courts need to see.
A qualified country expert will review your case and write a report that addresses several key points. First, they confirm that the conditions you described when you fled are documented and real. Second, they explain that these conditions have not changed. Third, they assess the specific risks you would face if returned to Eritrea today. This assessment takes into account your personal circumstances, including your draft status, your illegal departure, and any political profile you may have.[6]
Eritrean nationals who have exited the country illegally are likely to be subjected to persecution or serious harm upon return, including detention, torture, and punishment for draft evasion.
UNHCR, Eligibility Guidelines for Assessing the International Protection Needs of Asylum-Seekers from Eritrea, 2024
Furthermore, an expert can testify about the well-known patterns of the Eritrean journey. They can explain that long transit times through dangerous countries are normal, not suspicious. This helps the court understand your delay in context rather than viewing it as a negative factor.
The US One-Year Filing Deadline
If you are in the United States, there is an additional challenge. US law requires you to file your asylum application within one year of arriving in the country. If you missed this deadline, your asylum claim may be barred. However, there are two important exceptions that may apply to your case.[7]
The first exception is changed country conditions. If conditions in your home country have changed in a way that affects your claim, you can file after the one-year deadline. For Eritrea, you can argue that new reports, new evidence, or developments such as Eritrea's military involvement in the Tigray conflict create changed circumstances. You must file within a reasonable time after the change.
The second exception is extraordinary circumstances. This covers serious illness, mental health conditions, being an unaccompanied minor, or having received bad legal advice (known as ineffective assistance of counsel). If any of these prevented you from filing on time, the court may excuse the delay. For a detailed explanation of these exceptions, see our guide on the US one-year filing deadline.
Even if neither exception applies, you are not without options. Withholding of removal under INA Section 241(b)(3) and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) have no filing deadline. These forms of protection have a higher standard of proof, but they remain available regardless of when you file.[8]
UK: No Deadline, but Explain the Delay
The UK does not have a strict filing deadline for asylum claims. You can claim asylum at any time after arriving in the UK. However, the Home Office and immigration judges will consider a late claim as a factor in assessing your credibility. A long delay before claiming asylum may lead decision-makers to question whether your fear is genuine.
This does not mean your claim will fail. It means you need to explain the delay clearly. The reasons discussed above, such as transit difficulties, lack of knowledge, trauma, and language barriers, are all accepted by UK tribunals. Additionally, the fact that Eritrea's conditions remain unchanged works strongly in your favour. UK country guidance cases confirm that Eritrean nationals who left illegally and evaded national service face persecution on return.[9]
Conclusion
If you fled Eritrea years ago and have not yet claimed asylum, your case is not too old. Eritrea has not changed. The same president is in power. The same indefinite conscription continues. The same torture and repression persist. Your reasons for fleeing are as valid today as they were when you left. Explain your delay honestly, gather current country evidence, and consider obtaining an expert witness report to strengthen your claim. Whether you are in the UK, the US, or elsewhere, your case can succeed.
Footnotes
- Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (1951), Art 1A(2); UNHCR, 'Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status' (2019), paras 135-140
- UN Human Rights Council, 'Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea' (2016) A/HRC/32/47, paras 45-68; Proclamation on National Service No 82/1995 (Eritrea)
- UNHCR, 'Eligibility Guidelines for Assessing the International Protection Needs of Asylum-Seekers from Eritrea' (2024), paras 9-15
- UN Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL) and OHCHR, 'Detained and Dehumanised: Report on Human Rights Abuses against Migrants in Libya' (2023), paras 15-30
- US Department of State, 'Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Eritrea' (2025); UK Home Office, 'Country Policy and Information Note: Eritrea — National Service and Illegal Exit' (2025)
- UK Upper Tribunal, MST and Others (national service — risk categories) Eritrea [2016] UKUT 443 (IAC); expert evidence standards under Practice Direction 10 (2023)
- Immigration and Nationality Act (US), s 208(a)(2)(B) and (D) (one-year filing deadline and exceptions); 8 CFR 208.4(a)
- INA s 241(b)(3) (withholding of removal); Convention Against Torture, Art 3; 8 CFR 208.16-208.18
- UK Upper Tribunal, MST and Others (national service — risk categories) Eritrea [2016] UKUT 443 (IAC); Nationality and Borders Act 2022, s 25 (late claims and credibility)
Sources
- UN Human Rights Council, Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea, 2016
- UK Home Office, Country Policy and Information Note: Eritrea — National Service and Illegal Exit, 2025
- Human Rights Watch, Eritrea: Events Reports, 2025
- Amnesty International, Eritrea Country Page, 2025
- UK Upper Tribunal, MST and Others (national service — risk categories) Eritrea [2016] UKUT 443 (IAC)
Need an expert witness report for your case?
Our country experts provide independent reports for asylum and immigration cases in the UK, US, Canada, and EU.
Order an expert witness report |
Find a country expert witness |
About our expert team