Last updated:
Photo: 2016/366/33 Sick - Ken Bauer
El Salvador healthcare collapse has accelerated since the start of the State of Exception in March 2022. Severe medicine shortages, specialist physician attrition, and structural underfunding have produced a public health system that struggles to deliver basic care. For patients with chronic conditions — diabetes, HIV, mental illness, dialysis-dependent renal disease — the consequences are direct. This article examines the documented patterns and their implications for asylum claims involving medical risk on return.[1]
The evidence base draws on the World Health Organization (WHO), PAHO/Pan American Health Organization, Cristosal, Médecins Sans Frontières, the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Salvadoran medical associations operating in exile, and Salvadoran public-spending audits.
Essential medicines in shortage at public hospitals (2024-25)
Health workers who emigrated since 2022 (estimates)
Public health spending as % of total government spending
Detained in State of Exception — health system strain
Background: A System Under Stress
El Salvador's public healthcare system has long been underfunded and unevenly distributed. The Instituto Salvadoreño del Seguro Social (ISSS) covers formal-sector workers. The Ministry of Health (MINSAL) network covers the remainder of the population. Together, they serve approximately 6.3 million people. The system has historically depended on imported medicines and on a workforce that includes many specialists trained abroad.[2]
Since 2022, multiple pressures have converged to accelerate decline. The State of Exception has added 85,000+ detainees requiring some form of health screening and care. Specialist physicians have emigrated in large numbers, citing both wage stagnation and security concerns. Centralised procurement reforms have produced documented medicine shortages. As a result, the system that was already stretched is now in measurable collapse.
Medicine Shortages
Salvadoran medical associations and patient organisations have documented severe shortages across essential medicines categories. The shortages affect both ISSS and MINSAL networks. The pattern is most acute for the following categories.[3]
| Medicine category | Affected patients | Documented shortage pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Antiretrovirals (HIV) | ~25,000 PLHIV in treatment | Intermittent stockouts of first-line regimens since 2023 |
| Insulin and diabetes drugs | ~600,000 diabetics | Recurring shortages of long-acting insulins |
| Antihypertensives | ~1.5 million hypertensives | Generic substitutions; combination therapy gaps |
| Psychiatric medication | ~200,000 patients | Antipsychotic and SSRI shortages |
| Cancer treatment | ~15,000 in active treatment | Chemotherapy delays and substitutions |
| Dialysis supplies | ~3,500 dialysis-dependent | Periodic interruptions; rationing |
Specialist Physician Attrition
Specialist physicians have left El Salvador in significant numbers since 2022. Causes include wage stagnation, professional frustration with system breakdown, security concerns, and recruitment by Spanish, Mexican, and US healthcare systems. Salvadoran medical associations estimate that more than 4,000 health workers have emigrated since 2022. The attrition has been most acute in the following specialities.[4]
- Oncology — fewer than 80 active oncologists remaining in El Salvador.
- Psychiatry — approximately 200 psychiatrists for 6.3 million people.
- Nephrology — chronic shortages affecting dialysis services.
- Paediatric subspecialties — particularly cardiology and oncology.
- Anaesthesiology — affecting surgical capacity.
Why this matters for asylum: When an applicant requires specialist care that is not reliably available in El Salvador's public sector, the question of return engages Article 3 ECHR and CAT non-refoulement obligations. The leading UK authority is AM (Zimbabwe) v SSHD [2020] UKSC 17, which set the test for medical cases following Paposhvili v Belgium [2017] ECtHR. The documented shortage pattern is directly relevant to this test.
Knock-on Effects of the State of Emergency
The State of Exception, in place since March 2022 and repeatedly renewed, has added structural pressure on the health system. The 85,000+ detained population requires medical screening, treatment of pre-existing conditions, and emergency care. Detention conditions have produced documented outbreaks of skin disease, tuberculosis recrudescence, and mental health crises. See our companion article on the El Salvador State of Emergency.[5]
Vulnerable Populations
Several populations face particular vulnerability when the system fails. For these populations, asylum claims involving medical risk on return have a stronger evidentiary foundation.[6]
- People living with HIV — intermittent antiretroviral access produces resistance and treatment failure.
- Dialysis-dependent patients — interruption rapidly produces death.
- Children with rare conditions — limited subspecialty care.
- Patients with severe mental illness — limited psychiatric medication.
- Cancer patients — treatment delays and substitutions.
- Transgender Salvadorans — limited access to hormone therapy and gender-affirming care.
Healthcare system collapse in El Salvador is not a future risk. It is a documented present condition. Patients with chronic illnesses face genuine and immediate risk to life when public-sector care fails to deliver the medicines and specialist attention they need.
PAHO/WHO, El Salvador country office statement (2024)
Implications for Asylum Claims
For Salvadoran applicants whose claims involve medical risk on return, the evidentiary framework is well established.[7]
- Article 3 ECHR / Paposhvili test — risk of intense suffering or serious decline in health on return.
- US withholding of removal under CAT — for applicants facing death from treatment interruption.
- Particular social group — patients with specific conditions may qualify in some jurisdictions.
- Country expert evidence on system collapse is essential — see our country expert reports guide.
- Medical evidence from the applicant's treating clinicians documenting condition and care needs.
Conclusion
El Salvador's healthcare system has experienced accelerating collapse since 2022. Medicine shortages, specialist attrition, and underfunding combine to create documented risk for patients with chronic conditions. For asylum applicants requiring care that is not reliably available in El Salvador's public sector, the Paposhvili / AM (Zimbabwe) framework engages directly.
For practitioners, the analytical task is to combine clinical evidence on the applicant's condition with country expert evidence on system capacity. When this combination is built well, the legal framework supports protection on Article 3 ECHR or CAT grounds. See our wider country reports for related Central America analyses.
Footnotes
- PAHO/WHO, 'El Salvador Health Sector Profile' (2024 update); Cristosal Annual Report 2024-2025
- Ministry of Health (MINSAL) of El Salvador, public spending data; ISSS coverage figures
- Colegio Médico de El Salvador, public statements on medicine availability 2024-2025
- Salvadoran medical associations, estimates on health worker emigration 2022-2025
- Cristosal, 'El Salvador's State of Exception: 36 Months' (March 2025)
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Central America project documentation 2024
- AM (Zimbabwe) v SSHD [2020] UKSC 17; Paposhvili v Belgium (App. No. 41738/10, ECtHR, 13 December 2016)
Sources
- Cristosal, Human Rights Organisation
- Médecins Sans Frontières, MSF Reports
- Human Rights Watch, El Salvador
- UN OHCHR, El Salvador
Free checklist. Our two-page Expert Witness Preparation Checklist for US immigration court covers screening, voir dire readiness, methodology, neutrality and the eight pitfalls judges react to.
Need an expert witness report for your case?
Our country experts provide independent reports for asylum and immigration cases in the UK, US, Canada, and EU.
Order an expert witness report |
Find a country expert witness |
About our expert team