Last updated:
Photo: Switzerland-02521 - United Nations Office - Dennis Jarvis
A country expert report can be the difference between a refused asylum claim and protection. These reports provide independent, evidence-based assessments of conditions in your home country. They are written by qualified specialists who understand the political, social, and security situation in the country you fled. Decision-makers in the UK, US, and Canada all accept and value this type of evidence.[1]
Many asylum seekers do not know that country expert reports exist or how to get one. As a result, they rely only on their personal testimony and general background information. However, a tailored expert report addresses your specific situation. It explains exactly why someone with your profile faces danger. This asylum guide explains what these reports contain, when you need one, and how they can change the outcome of your case.
UK appeals overturned (often with new expert evidence)
US rule governing expert testimony
UK Practice Direction on expert evidence
Pages in a typical expert report
What Is a Country Expert Report?
A country expert report is an independent assessment of conditions in your home country. It is written by a qualified professional, often an academic researcher, former diplomat, journalist, or human rights professional. The key word is "independent." The expert does not work for you or against you. They provide an honest, research-based analysis.[2]
Unlike general background reports from organisations like UNHCR or Human Rights Watch, a country expert report is tailored to your specific case. The expert reviews your personal statement and the details of your claim. They then write a report that addresses the specific risks you face based on your profile. For example, if you are a political activist from Iran, the expert will explain what happens to political activists in Iran and whether the specific events in your case are consistent with known patterns.
This personalised approach is what makes expert reports so powerful. A general country report may say that political opponents face risk. However, an expert report explains exactly how your type of activism, in your specific region, leads to the specific type of persecution you describe.
When Do You Need a Country Expert Report?
There are three main situations where a country expert report is especially valuable.
At the Initial Claim Stage
Submitting an expert report with your initial asylum application shows the decision-maker that your claim is well-supported. It provides country evidence that goes beyond what the Home Office CPINs or US State Department reports cover. Furthermore, it addresses your individual risk profile from the start.
At the Appeal Stage
Many asylum claims are refused at the first decision. An expert report is often crucial on appeal. In the UK, the First-tier Tribunal allows new evidence. A strong expert report can address the specific reasons for refusal. For example, if the Home Office said internal relocation was possible, an expert can explain why it is not safe for someone with your profile.[3]
For a Fresh Claim
If your appeal has also failed, you may be able to make a fresh claim based on new evidence. A new expert report that addresses changed country conditions or new information about your case can form the basis of a fresh claim. The report must show that conditions have significantly changed since the last decision.[4]
What a Country Expert Report Covers
A good expert report covers several key areas. Each section builds the evidence that supports your asylum claim.
Country conditions. The report describes the current political, social, and security situation in your country. It uses published sources, academic research, and the expert's own knowledge. This section sets the context for your claim.
Specific risk profile. The expert analyses the risks faced by people with your particular characteristics. This might include your ethnicity, religion, political opinion, sexual orientation, gender, or social group. The report explains what typically happens to people like you in your country.
Return risk. The report assesses what would happen to you if you returned. Would you face arrest? Torture? Discrimination? The expert considers your specific circumstances, including whether the authorities know about your asylum claim abroad.
Internal relocation. Decision-makers often ask whether you could safely live in another part of your country instead of receiving asylum. The expert assesses whether this is realistic. They consider factors like surveillance, reach of persecutors, and access to basic services.[5]
How Judges Use Expert Evidence
Courts in different countries have clear rules about how expert evidence should be used. Understanding these rules helps you see why a good report matters.
In the UK, the Upper Tribunal's Practice Direction 10 sets out the requirements. The expert must have relevant qualifications. Their report must be objective and based on reliable sources. The expert has a duty to the court, not to the party that instructed them. Furthermore, the report must contain a statement of truth and list the expert's qualifications and sources.[6]
In the US, Federal Rules of Evidence 702 governs expert testimony. The expert must be qualified by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education. Their testimony must be based on sufficient facts and reliable methods. Immigration judges regularly accept expert reports and live testimony on country conditions.[7]
Expert evidence may be of considerable importance in asylum appeals. The tribunal must consider the qualifications of the expert, the reliability of their methodology, and the reasoning behind their conclusions.
UK Upper Tribunal, Practice Direction 10: Expert Evidence (2023)
What a Good Report Includes
| Section | What It Contains |
|---|---|
| Expert's qualifications | Academic degrees, research experience, publications, court appearances, years of expertise |
| Instructions and materials reviewed | List of documents the expert was given (personal statement, refusal letter, etc.) |
| Country background | Political situation, human rights record, security conditions, rule of law |
| Risk analysis for the applicant's profile | Specific risks for people with the applicant's characteristics (political, ethnic, religious, etc.) |
| Assessment of the applicant's account | Whether the events described are consistent with known patterns of persecution |
| Internal relocation assessment | Whether safe relocation is possible within the country |
| Sources and bibliography | Full list of reports, articles, and data relied upon |
| Statement of truth | Declaration that the report is honest, independent, and within the expert's area of knowledge |
How to Choose an Expert Witness
Not all experts are equal. Choosing the right expert for your case is very important. Here are the main things to look for.
Qualifications. The expert should have academic qualifications related to the country or region. A PhD in a relevant subject, published research, or significant field experience all add credibility. Judges want to see that the expert truly knows the country.
Independence. The expert must be independent. They should not be an advocate for your case. Their job is to provide an honest assessment, even if some conclusions are not favourable. Decision-makers trust independent experts more than those who appear to be acting as advocates.[8]
Court experience. An expert who has provided reports and testimony in asylum cases before understands what judges look for. They know how to structure a report, address key legal questions, and present evidence clearly. This experience makes their reports more effective.
Good report vs bad report: A good expert report is specific, well-sourced, and addresses your individual case. It explains the reasoning behind every conclusion. A bad report is vague, uses only general information, and does not link country conditions to your personal situation. Additionally, a good report acknowledges limitations honestly, while a bad report overstates conclusions. Judges can tell the difference, and a weak report can actually hurt your case.
How Country Expert Reports Change Outcomes
Many asylum appeals succeed because of new expert evidence. When a claim is refused at the initial stage, the decision-maker may not have considered detailed country evidence about your specific situation. On appeal, a strong expert report can fill this gap.
For example, the Home Office might refuse your claim because they believe you can relocate to another city in your country. An expert report that explains why relocation is not safe for your specific profile can change the outcome. Similarly, if the decision-maker doubted your account, an expert can confirm that what you describe is consistent with documented patterns of human rights violations.
In the UK, nearly half of asylum appeals are successful. New evidence, including expert reports, is often a key factor in these reversals. In the US, expert testimony has been cited as important evidence in many Board of Immigration Appeals decisions.[9]
How to Get a Country Expert Report from The Human Rights
The Human Rights connects asylum seekers and their lawyers with qualified country experts. You can search our expert witness directory to find specialists covering your country of origin. Each expert listed has been verified for their qualifications, independence, and court experience.
The process is simple. Your lawyer contacts the expert, provides your case materials, and the expert prepares a report tailored to your situation. Reports are typically completed within two to four weeks. Furthermore, experts can provide oral testimony at hearings if needed. For more information about the types of evidence that help asylum cases, see our asylum evidence guide.
Conclusion
Country expert reports are one of the most powerful tools in an asylum case. They provide independent, tailored evidence that general background reports cannot match. Whether you are at the initial claim stage, on appeal, or making a fresh claim, an expert report can strengthen your case significantly. Choose a qualified, independent expert with court experience. Make sure the report addresses your specific risk profile and the questions that matter to the decision-maker. With the right expert evidence, many applicants receive the protection they deserve.
Footnotes
- UK Upper Tribunal, Practice Direction 10: Expert Evidence (2023); Federal Rules of Evidence 702; IRB, Chairperson's Guidelines on Evidence (2020)
- Civil Procedure Rules (UK), Part 35: Expert Evidence; Kennedy v Cordia (Services) LLP [2016] UKSC 6 (duties of expert witnesses)
- Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Rules 2014, r 15 (evidence at appeal); Ladd v Marshall [1954] EWCA Civ 1 (new evidence on appeal)
- UK Immigration Rules, para 353 (fresh claims); WM (DRC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 1495
- UNHCR, Guidelines on International Protection No. 4: Internal Flight or Relocation Alternative (HCR/GIP/03/04, 2003); UK Home Office, 'Asylum Policy Instruction: Internal Relocation' (2024)
- UK Upper Tribunal, Practice Direction 10: Expert Evidence (2023), paras 1-15; Slimani (expert evidence; Immigration Court) [2024] UKUT 00087 (IAC)
- Federal Rules of Evidence 702; Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 509 US 579 (1993); Kumho Tire Co. v Carmichael 526 US 137 (1999)
- R (on the application of Mibanga) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWCA Civ 367 (proper treatment of expert evidence)
- UK Home Office, Immigration Statistics: Appeal Outcomes (2025); TRAC Immigration, Immigration Court Decision Data (2025); Matter of H-L-H- & Z-Y-Z-, 25 I&N Dec. 209 (BIA 2010)
Sources
- UK Upper Tribunal, Practice Direction 10: Expert Evidence, 2023
- Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 702: Testimony by Expert Witnesses, as amended 2023
- UNHCR, Guidelines on International Protection No. 4: Internal Flight or Relocation Alternative, 2003
- UK Home Office, Immigration Statistics: Year Ending December 2025, 2025
- TRAC Immigration, Immigration Court Decision Data and Reports, 2025
- Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Chairperson's Guidelines on Evidence, 2020
- UK Court of Appeal, Mibanga v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWCA Civ 367, 2005
Need an expert witness report for your case?
Our country experts provide independent reports for asylum and immigration cases in the UK, US, Canada, and EU.
Order an expert witness report |
Find a country expert witness |
About our expert team