Human Rights Experts · https://thehuman-rights.com/blasphemy-laws-12-countries-executed-beliefs/
Human Rights Religious Persecution

Blasphemy Laws: 12 Countries Where You Can Be Executed for Beliefs

Blasphemy Laws: 12 Countries Where You Can Be Executed for Beliefs

Last updated:

Photo: United Nations - eGuide Travel

Blasphemy laws worldwide remain on the statute books in dozens of countries. In 12 of them, the maximum penalty for blasphemy is death. Pakistan's Section 295-C, Iran's Article 263 of the Islamic Penal Code, Saudi Arabia's interpretation of Sharia law, and similar provisions in Afghanistan, Mauritania, Brunei, Somalia, parts of Nigeria, and several other states permit the death penalty for those convicted of insulting religion. Furthermore, where formal capital sentences are not imposed, mob violence frequently kills accused individuals before any trial. This article surveys the 12 countries where blasphemy can lead to execution, the legal frameworks involved, and the asylum implications for religious dissidents.[1]

For broader human rights context, see the human rights section. For Pakistan-specific blasphemy analysis, see the article on Pakistan's blasphemy law.

12
Countries with death penalty for blasphemy
75+
Countries with some criminal blasphemy law
~85
People killed in Pakistan for blasphemy since 1990 (mob)
9
Article 18 ICCPR — international standard violated

The International Standard

Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) protects freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. Article 19 protects freedom of expression. The UN Human Rights Committee has stated that blasphemy laws are incompatible with the ICCPR except in narrow circumstances. Furthermore, the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief has repeatedly called for the repeal of blasphemy laws worldwide.[2]

Why blasphemy laws violate human rights standards

Blasphemy laws violate several human rights principles. They privilege one religion over others (violating equality and non-discrimination). They criminalise belief and expression (violating Articles 18 and 19 ICCPR). They create vulnerability for religious minorities and non-believers (creating discrimination). Furthermore, in practice, they are often used as tools of personal vengeance, property disputes, and political repression rather than for any genuine religious protection.

The 12 Countries Where Blasphemy Carries the Death Penalty

The following twelve countries provide for the death penalty for blasphemy or closely related offences such as apostasy and "insulting religion".[3]

Country Legal provision Status
Pakistan Penal Code Section 295-C (death for insulting Prophet Muhammad) Mandatory death penalty
Iran Islamic Penal Code Arts 262-263 (insulting Prophet); Art 286 ("corruption on earth") Death penalty
Saudi Arabia Sharia interpretation; no codified Penal Code Death penalty in practice
Afghanistan Sharia under Taliban; pre-Taliban Penal Code Art 1 Death penalty under Taliban
Mauritania 2018 Apostasy Law; Penal Code Art 306 Mandatory death penalty since 2018
Brunei Sharia Penal Code 2014 (phased implementation) Death penalty for some offences
Somalia Sharia-based provisions; Al-Shabaab in controlled areas Death penalty in some areas
Nigeria (12 northern states) State Sharia courts under federal constitutional protection Death penalty in state Sharia codes
UAE Federal Decree-Law on Hate Crimes; provisions on insulting religion Death penalty available
Yemen Penal Code Art 259 (apostasy); de facto Houthi-area enforcement Death penalty
Qatar Sharia provisions; Penal Code apostasy implications Theoretical death penalty
Maldives Constitution requires citizens to be Muslim; apostasy provisions Death penalty for apostasy
Table 1: Twelve countries where blasphemy can carry the death penalty.

Pakistan: The Paradigm Case

Pakistan's Section 295-C of the Penal Code makes "use of derogatory remarks etc., in respect of the Holy Prophet" punishable by death — and only by death following the 1991 Federal Shariat Court ruling that life imprisonment was unconstitutional. The provision has been used against hundreds of individuals. Many have been killed by mobs before trial; others have spent years in prison before exoneration. Lawyers defending blasphemy cases have themselves been assassinated.[4]

Mob violence often precedes formal prosecution:

Pakistan documented over 85 extrajudicial killings of blasphemy-accused individuals since 1990. Many killings occurred before any formal charge or trial. Furthermore, accused individuals sometimes seek refuge with police, only to be killed in police custody by lynch mobs or by sympathetic officers.

Iran: Apostasy and "Corruption on Earth"

Iran's Islamic Penal Code provides for the death penalty for apostasy (under judicial interpretation rather than explicit codification) and for "insulting the Prophet" (Article 262-263). Furthermore, the broader provision of Article 286 (corruption on earth — mofsed-e-filarz) has been used against religious dissidents. The post-2022 protest crackdowns have included executions of individuals charged under Article 286 in connection with anti-regime activity that had religious overtones.[5]

Afghanistan Under the Taliban

Since the Taliban's August 2021 return to power, Afghanistan has applied its interpretation of Sharia law. The 2024 Law on the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice formally codified many of these provisions. Apostasy and blasphemy are punishable by death under the Taliban's interpretation. Furthermore, the application is summary and often occurs without formal trial.[6]

Asylum Implications

Persons accused of blasphemy in any of the 12 countries above have strong asylum claims. The Convention ground is religion. Furthermore, where the accused is a non-believer, atheist, or member of a religious minority, race or PSG grounds may also apply. Many cases also engage Article 3 ECHR risk and CAT protection given the documented use of torture and the death penalty.[7]

Blasphemy laws criminalise the human right to freedom of religion or belief and freedom of expression. States with such laws must repeal or radically reform them in order to comply with international human rights standards.
UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, Annual Report (2024)

Evidence for Blasphemy Asylum Cases

  • FIR or court documents: Where a formal accusation has been made.
  • Country expert report: Profile-matched analysis of the legal framework and enforcement patterns.
  • Personal narrative: The accusation, the response, and the threats received.
  • Family and community statements: Confirming the accusation and ongoing risk.
  • Mob violence documentation: Where applicable, evidence of mob attacks against the family.
  • Medico-legal report: Where torture or violence has occurred.

Conclusion

Blasphemy laws worldwide criminalise belief and expression. In 12 countries, the death penalty applies. Pakistan's Section 295-C, Iran's Articles 262-263 and 286, and Saudi Arabia's Sharia interpretation are the most active. Furthermore, mob violence frequently kills the accused before any formal trial. For asylum lawyers, blasphemy accusations from any of these countries produce strong religion-grounded asylum claims that should be supported by profile-matched country expert evidence. To commission such a report, use the find expert witness service. For broader context, see the human rights section.


Footnotes

  1. USCIRF, 'Blasphemy Laws Worldwide Report' (2024); Humanists International, 'Freedom of Thought Report' (2024)
  2. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Arts 18, 19; UN Human Rights Committee General Comment 34 (2011)
  3. USCIRF, 'Annual Report 2024'; Open Doors, 'World Watch List 2025'; Pew Research Center 'Blasphemy Laws Worldwide' (2024)
  4. Pakistan Penal Code Section 295-C; Federal Shariat Court ruling (1991); HRW, 'Pakistan Blasphemy Cases' (2024)
  5. Islamic Republic of Iran Penal Code, Arts 262, 263, 286; Amnesty International, 'Iran: Executions Related to 2022-2023 Protests' (2024-2026)
  6. Taliban Law on the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice (2024); UN OHCHR Afghanistan briefings (2024-2026)
  7. UNHCR, 'Guidelines on International Protection: Religion-Based Refugee Claims' (HCR/GIP/04/06, 2004)

Sources

  1. USCIRF, Blasphemy Laws Reports, 2024
  2. UN OHCHR, Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, 2024
  3. Pew Research Center, Blasphemy Laws Worldwide, 2024
  4. Open Doors, World Watch List 2026, 2026
  5. Amnesty International, Religion-Related Reports, 2024-2025

Need an expert witness report for your case?

Our country experts provide independent reports for asylum and immigration cases in the UK, US, Canada, and EU.
Order an expert witness report  |  Find a country expert witness  |  About our expert team

Share this article: 𝕏 f in ☎

Need an Expert Witness for Your Asylum Case?

Get a sample report, expert CV, and free consultation today.
Human rights documentation photo
Human Rights Experts
Expert witness reports and country condition analysis for asylum and human rights cases worldwide.
Stay Informed
Subscribe to receive the latest human rights news, expert analysis, and country condition updates.
© 2026 Human Rights Experts. All Rights Reserved.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram