Last updated:
Photo: United Nations Headquarters - pedrik
If your asylum claim was refused, you usually have the right to appeal. A refusal is not the end of your case. Many asylum seekers win protection on appeal. This asylum appeal guide explains how the appeal process works in the UK, the US, and Canada. It covers the deadlines you must meet, the forms you need to file, the grounds for appeal, and how to build the strongest possible case for your hearing.[1]
Thousands of asylum seekers succeed on appeal every year. In the UK, almost half of all asylum appeals are allowed. However, success depends on acting quickly, understanding the rules, and presenting strong new evidence. If you have received a refusal letter, read this asylum guide carefully. Time is not on your side.
UK asylum appeals allowed (2024-2025)
UK appeal deadline (in-country)
US BIA appeal deadline
Canada RAD appeal deadline (working days)
UK Asylum Appeal Process: First-tier Tribunal
In the UK, if the Home Office refuses your asylum claim, you can appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). This is an independent court that reviews the Home Office decision. The Tribunal judge hears your evidence, considers the law, and makes a fresh decision about your case.[2]
Deadlines
The deadline to file your appeal depends on where you are. If you are in the UK, you have 14 calendar days from the date you receive the refusal. If you are outside the UK, you have 28 calendar days. These deadlines are strict. The Tribunal can reject a late appeal unless you have an exceptionally good reason for the delay.
Filing Your Appeal: Form IAFT-1
You file the appeal using Form IAFT-1. This form requires your personal details, your Home Office reference number, and the grounds of your appeal. "Grounds of appeal" are the reasons you believe the refusal was wrong. Your solicitor will prepare the form and the grounds. If you do not have a solicitor, Legal Aid may be available for asylum appeals.
What Happens at the Hearing
At the Tribunal hearing, you will give evidence under oath. Your lawyer asks you questions to present your case. Then the Home Office Presenting Officer may cross-examine you. The judge may also ask questions. After hearing all the evidence and legal arguments, the judge reserves the decision. You usually receive the written decision within a few weeks. If you lose, you can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal, but only if the judge made an error of law.[3]
US Asylum Appeal Process: Board of Immigration Appeals
In the US, if an immigration judge denies your asylum claim, you can appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA is the highest administrative body for immigration cases. It is part of the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), which is under the Department of Justice.[4]
Deadline and Form
You must file your appeal within 30 calendar days of the immigration judge's decision. You use Form EOIR-26 (Notice of Appeal). There is a filing fee, but you can request a fee waiver. After filing the form, you submit a written brief. The brief explains why the judge's decision was wrong. The government also submits a brief arguing that the decision was correct.
How the BIA Decides
The BIA usually does not hold a new hearing. Instead, it reviews the written record from the immigration court and the briefs from both sides. The BIA can affirm the judge's decision, reverse it, or send the case back for a new hearing. If the BIA denies your appeal, you can file a petition for review with a federal Circuit Court of Appeals. This is a court that reviews whether the BIA applied the law correctly. The petition for review must be filed within 30 days of the BIA decision.[5]
Canada Asylum Appeal Process: Refugee Appeal Division
In Canada, if the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) refuses your refugee claim, you can appeal to the Refugee Appeal Division (RAD). The RAD is a division of the IRB. You must file your appeal within 15 working days of receiving the written decision. The appeal is based mainly on written submissions. The RAD reviews the record and your legal arguments. It can also consider new evidence if that evidence was not reasonably available at the original hearing.[6]
If the RAD denies your appeal, you can apply for judicial review at the Federal Court of Canada. This requires leave (permission) from the court. The Federal Court reviews whether the RAD made a legal error, not whether it made the right factual decision.
CRITICAL: Missing your deadline means losing your right to appeal.
In the UK, you have only 14 days. In the US, 30 days. In Canada, 15 working days. If you miss the deadline, the tribunal or court will almost certainly refuse to hear your case. The moment you receive a refusal letter, contact a lawyer. Write the deadline on your calendar. Do not wait even one day.
Appeal Process: UK vs US vs Canada
| Feature | UK | US | Canada |
|---|---|---|---|
| Appeal body | First-tier Tribunal (IAC) | Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) | Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) |
| Deadline | 14 days in-country / 28 days out-of-country | 30 calendar days | 15 working days |
| Form required | IAFT-1 | EOIR-26 | RAD appeal form |
| Hearing type | Oral hearing (in-person or video) | Paper-based (BIA reviews written record) | Usually written submissions only |
| New evidence | Yes, with tribunal permission | Not usually at BIA stage | Yes, if previously unavailable |
| Success rate | ~49% | ~15-20% | ~10-15% |
| Further appeal | Upper Tribunal (error of law) | Federal Circuit Court of Appeals | Federal Court (judicial review) |
Grounds of Appeal: Why the Decision Was Wrong
To win your appeal, you must show that the original decision was wrong. There are four main types of grounds that your lawyer can use in your asylum appeal guide strategy.[7]
- Error of law: The decision-maker applied the wrong legal test. For example, they may have used the wrong definition of persecution or failed to apply the correct standard of proof.
- Error of fact: The decision-maker got important facts wrong. For example, they said your country is safe when recent evidence shows otherwise.
- Procedural unfairness: The process was unfair. For example, the interpreter was poor, you were not given a chance to respond to concerns, or the interview was too short.
- New evidence: You have important evidence that was not available at the original hearing. This might be a new medical report, a new country conditions report, or a witness statement.
Your lawyer will study the refusal letter and identify the strongest grounds for your appeal. Focus on the grounds that have the most evidence to support them. Weak arguments can distract the judge from your strongest points.
Strengthening Your Appeal with New Evidence
The appeal is your chance to fix the problems with your original case. Here are the most effective ways to build a stronger case.
Expert witness reports: An expert witness can write a detailed report about conditions in your home country. This report can directly address the reasons given in your refusal letter. For example, if the Home Office said you could safely relocate within your country, an expert can explain why that is wrong.
Updated country evidence: Conditions change. A country that seemed stable six months ago may now be in crisis. New reports from UNHCR, Human Rights Watch, or Amnesty International can provide updated evidence.
Medical evidence: If you suffer from PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder -- a mental health condition caused by trauma), a medical report can explain how trauma affected your ability to give evidence at the original hearing. Medico-legal reports documenting torture injuries carry significant weight with judges.[8]
Address each refusal reason: Read your refusal letter word by word. It tells you exactly why the decision-maker refused you. Your appeal must respond to every single reason. If they said your story was not consistent, explain the inconsistency. If they said your fear was not well-founded, provide evidence that it is.
The benefit of the doubt should be given to the applicant, provided they have made a genuine effort to substantiate their claim and their general credibility has been established.
UNHCR Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status, para 204
Appeal Success Rates by Country
How Expert Witnesses Help on Appeal
Expert witnesses are one of the most powerful tools you have on appeal. A country expert provides an independent, evidence-based assessment of the conditions in your home country. Judges treat expert reports as important evidence, especially when they address specific weaknesses in the original decision.[9]
For example, an expert can explain whether state protection is available for people like you. They can assess whether internal relocation is realistic. They can also describe patterns of persecution that the decision-maker may not have known about. In the UK, the Upper Tribunal has confirmed that expert evidence can carry significant weight when it fills gaps in the Home Office's own country information.
In the US, immigration judges regularly receive expert testimony. In Canada, the RAD can consider expert reports as new evidence. You can find qualified experts through our expert witness directory. The right expert report can turn a losing case into a winning one. For more on how human rights evidence supports asylum claims, explore our resources.
Conclusion
A refused asylum claim is not the end. In the UK, the US, and Canada, you have the right to appeal. However, the appeal process is strict. Deadlines are short. Rules must be followed. The most important things you can do are: act immediately, get a good lawyer, file on time, and gather strong new evidence. Expert witness reports, updated country evidence, and medical reports can significantly improve your chances. Nearly half of UK asylum appeals succeed. With the right preparation and support, your appeal can succeed too.
Footnotes
- Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, s 82 (right of appeal); Immigration and Nationality Act (US), s 240(c)(4); Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (Canada), s 110
- Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Rules 2014, r 19; Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, s 11
- Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, ss 11-13 (permission to appeal to Upper Tribunal); AH (Sudan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] UKHL 49
- 8 CFR 1003.1 (BIA jurisdiction and authority); EOIR, 'Board of Immigration Appeals Practice Manual' (2025), Ch 1
- Immigration and Nationality Act (US), s 242 (judicial review); 8 CFR 1003.38 (30-day filing deadline for BIA appeal)
- Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (Canada), s 110 (RAD appeal); Refugee Appeal Division Rules (SOR/2012-257), r 3 (15 working day deadline)
- E and R v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49 (error of law standard); UNHCR, Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status (reissued 2019), paras 195-205
- Istanbul Protocol: Manual on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment (UN, 2022 revision); Helen Bamber Foundation, 'Medico-Legal Reports in Asylum Cases' (2024)
- UK Upper Tribunal, Practice Direction 10: Expert Evidence (2023); Federal Rules of Evidence 702 (US); Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 509 US 579 (1993)
Sources
- UK Home Office, Immigration System Statistics: Year Ending December 2025, 2025
- UK First-tier Tribunal (IAC), Practice Directions and Guidance, 2023
- Executive Office for Immigration Review, Board of Immigration Appeals: Practitioner Resources, 2025
- TRAC Immigration, Immigration Court and BIA Decision Data, 2025
- Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Refugee Appeal Division, 2025
- Freedom from Torture, Expert Evidence and Country Reports, 2025
Need an expert witness report for your case?
Our country experts provide independent reports for asylum and immigration cases in the UK, US, Canada, and EU.
Order an expert witness report |
Find a country expert witness |
About our expert team